Horno Solar

Informations about renewable energy to save our world

Global Warming: A Ghastly Proposal

This business about global warming is actually starting to look like a nightmare for humanity. It’s becoming more a ghastly proposal, not an “inconvenient truth.”
Global warming is occurring at even a more accelerated pace than what was originally predicted, many who are expert sources on this issue posit. Most are still a bit skeptical of the Global Warming issue. It’s commonplace for the press- listening and reading public to be cynical and even critical today. It’s not only that opposing views of any issue are part of the mainstream “Op-Ed” consciousness; it’s just good business and idea salesmanship to keep everything murky, dusty and convoluted.

The news – especially science news – is so hazy and muddled with political and religious sources traditionally centered in spin, connotation, even stigma that trying to believe in anything today is very hard. In a society that cannot decide if a little white wine each day can cure cancer or lead to alcoholism, finding a Gregorian “middle ground” is tough.

And because science is always based in theory, it’s even more confusing to sort out good theory from bad; and just the way scientific theory is designed and argued, nothing is really set in stone and is not fact, per se, rather, scientific theory is just what its name implies — it is theory. Considering much of the fingerprint and harbinger evidences surrounding global warming, however; this theory becomes more denotatively arguable and convincing with each new day.

Most people stay convicted to their beliefs even long after their beliefs have been denigrated or sometimes even proven totally false. In the case of global warming, ever increasing scientific theory is an ongoing constant, though, and this leads to a very unsettling future forecast for Mother Earth, the human race and really, most types of species that reside here. Validation surrounding the global warming theory is so stacked it’s alarming.

One such truth: The rapid buildup of killer carbon dioxide in large lakes like Nyos in Africa (which saw an explosion kill about 1,700 people) creates stern consternation by those who are even slightly to the side of “green.” If it happened to Lake Nyos, what’s in store for Lake Superior, Erie, Huron or the “thousand lakes of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Missouri or Finland? What’s in it for Loch Ness in Scotland? How’s about the Mississippi and Nile rivers? Can we include about every body of water here if our waters continue heating? Carbon dioxide buildup in large lakes is not the stuff impossible fictions are made of – this is a stark reality – and global warming is the root of the problem, scientists argue.

Just to reiterate and try to ring the alarm a bit louder: It’s an enigma why people aren’t up in arms about this – and if the implications behind global warming are true, it might indeed be the biggest crisis humankind has ever faced.

Scientists say the dinosaurs went extinct due to climate changes brought on by a comet hitting the earth 65 million years ago. The estimated 6-mile-wide comet slammed into the Mexican Yucatan Peninsula region “leaving a hole 112 miles wide. It wiped out the dinosaurs and more than 75 percent of the species on the planet, throwing up a cloud of dust that blocked the sun for months, killing off plants at the base of the food chain and causing ecosystems to collapse worldwide; it was a global environmental catastrophe”.

Are we going to go extinct because of our factories’ creation of plastic ornaments on lawns? Is the Earth heading for a quick demise because SUVs and trucks are two of the planets biggest polluters? Tables, chairs and houses are taking the place of rain forests; and through the rapid buildup of developing nations’ industrial revolutions, our world has been kidnapped – and there’s little that can be done to stop global warming – many who are very familiar with this issue contend.

Even the most drastic actions – which entail a global greening in very strict, drastic and complete uniformity – may not be enough to fend off the inevitable greenhouse effect that is predicted.
As things continue to unfold concerning global warming, however, a lot of us are seeing that all this fretting over the world’s environment isn’t a political trick or a smoke and mirrors routine. No. Our atmosphere is becoming more like a microwave and we’re rotating around on the big dish inside.

I’d really like to see proof to the contrary but everything coming out lately points to making valid the global warming theory. To be honest, I’m getting quite upset over the spicy forecasting that’s being done these days. With the threat of the equatorial waters getting about as hot as a chili pepper over time, what’s there to even plan in the mid-century we’re living within?

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has found that this warming is due to anthropogenic factors (mankind is cooking things up here). The Intergovernmental Panel’s Fourth Assessment Report, completed in 2007, found that even if temperatures stabilize, the world is expected to heat up during most of this millennium. The sea level has risen 4 to 10 inches (10-25 cm) on a global scale over the past 100 years. “With additional warming, sea level is projected to rise from half a foot to 3 feet (15-92 cm) more during the next 100 years.

On average, 50 to 100 feet (15-30 meters) of beach are lost for every foot (0.3 meters) of sea-level rise. Local land subsidence (sinking) and/or uplift due to geologic forces and coastal development will also affect the rate of coastal land loss. There seems to be a lack of real, viable solutions for keeping Mother Earth blue and green and not gray and black.

Share
posted by admin in basic theory and have Comments (9)

9 Responses to “Global Warming: A Ghastly Proposal”

  1. nebulaseventy says:

    cool

  2. motoxmainia says:

    @MarkNobes-your fighting a loosing battle

    time to leave the dark side

    jolly up the world is fine it dosnt need your help

    why don’t you listen to one of the chill out vids on your own channel

  3. arryhuk says:

    Interesting,it would appear that the AGW deniers see the very fact of and reality of AGW as a battle!!
    And yet they give no reasons for being in the ‘conflict’.
    They do not appear to have any convictions or purpose to their ‘crusade’,unless of course you add money,then all of their misrepresentations,lies,manipulations,immature comments and sophistry make perfect sense,it’s all being done for the sake of money.

  4. arryhuk says:

    For AGW realists it is about dealing with and trying to mitigate a potentially catastrophic future for life on this planet,money doesn’t even register in comparison.

  5. AGWnot says:

    MarkNobes – The question now is how many more lies will be admitted to by the organisations pushing AGW. Having Pachauri admit that the glaciers won’t melt by 2035 and Phil Jones saying that there has been no particular warming in the past 10 to 15 years means that humans are not responsible for any fluctuations in temperature.

    So, how many more lies do they have to admit to before you turn into a skeptic? I’m sure there must be a turning point somewhere within you.

  6. motoxmainia says:

    @MarkNobes-marque de ce canular fucking est mort comme un âne avec le reste de votre idéologie libérale
    même votre héros comme (Monbiot le vil) est se sont lancés à quitter ce AGW Sinking Ship is OVER

  7. Ramn2048 says:

    @MarkNobes I’m sorry but this is getting ridiculous. How hard is it to understand the concept of averages? 10 years of gentle cooling can easily show up as being warmer than 10 years of large warming. Stop comparing velocity to distance.

  8. motoxmainia says:

    @MarkNobes-hey mark all i can say is your just treating this hoax as a religion
    why don’t you feel good about the FACT agw is a hoax
    you can just enjoy the rest of your life with no worries
    the sky will not fall is good news is it not !

  9. c02Pirate says:

    @MarkNobes

    I think you and every other warmer are missing the point. It is NOT warming that is the main point of contention. There is NO argument that the planet has been warming for the last 10,000yrs and more recently after the LIA.
    This is NOT contested BUT – there has been some slight cooling since 2002 though not huge and not significant. This has even been acknowledged by Phil Jones in a recent interview.
    What is at odds with everything scientific is the scam of the AGW hypothesis.